Two decades ago, across the country, the housing market tanked. Up until this point, housing prices had seen an average and steady increase. Around the turn of the millennium, the market really cranked up and held that way for 5-6 years. Because the market was so good, new agents came in droves. (See previous post entitled “I Get It”)
Just 11 years ago (1996), there were only 408,000 real estate agents, brokers and appraisers employed full and part time nationwide. Four years later that figure had increased by more than five times to 2.1 Million agents and within a year (2001) there was a further 10% increase in agents to 2.3 Million. In
In the cyclical way of markets, the up-curve has now swung noticeably down. With more agents competing for a shrinking pie, median income, and their very survival, many will certainly be affected.
A study by the National Association of Realtors said the median income for its members fell to $49,300 in 2004, down 5.6 percent from 2002, blaming the influx of new agents for the decline. In April 2007, the NAR predicted that
For most agents, then, listings are easy to get, but they're not selling. As a result, the average agent is finding his or her personal listing inventory swelling. This is not a good thing. It means spending more money to sell each listing, which means, in turn, that agent's net income could drop still further.
In average times, 20% of new agents fail within their first year in business, and 80% don't make it to their fifth anniversary. These are becoming below average times, so these statistics will only get worse. The harsh reality is that there is no longer enough business to support all the agents operating in
Agents positioned as desperate, are desperate. The fact of the matter is, however, there is an exclusive subset of agents in
0 comments on Market and Agent Trends
Add a comment
To add comments without entering your email and image verification, you must be logged in. Login or Join Blogster

